JournalismPakistan.com | Published September 30, 2019 | Z.B.Saigol
Join our WhatsApp channelI’m going to cut straight to the chase. I’ve never been an admirer of Imran Khan. Not when he was young and doing great things with the cricket bat and ball and certainly not when he decided to take up politics.
Well, that was in the past.
His speech at the United Nations General Assembly was not only an eye-opener but won me over. The man has changed my perspective of himself and all he stands for. He has matured, his vision has broadened, and on Friday Imran Khan, the prime minister, did the country proud.
He was impressive. He spoke well, he explained well, and certainly gave off the impression that he knew what he was talking about. He laid it out in a matter of fact style that just served to highlight what Pakistani leaders have been unable to do in the past. He did it on equal footing; no holds barred.
I watched his speech twice.
In the past, I have never watched any Pakistani leader’s speech to the end, not even Benazir Bhutto’s. This speech was an education. It took apart misconceptions and perspectives, laid bare the facts and challenged all to disagree. And yes, it was not a speech designed to appease his voter base. It was not for domestic consumption. It was a speech fit for the United Nations General Assembly.
For 24 hours afterward, the internet, the social media, the electronic media, and the print media buzzed with little else and that too on both sides of the border. The conversation continues and rightfully so.
There are multiple reasons for this as PM Imran highlighted all that mattered, starting with global warming and the dire impact it could have on Pakistan’s future, the war on terror and Islamophobia, and finally the fearful situation in Kashmir. All these issues are of great importance. People the world over have been looking up all issues he spoke about. There is a new-found sense of awareness and curiosity. This is good. This is positive.
Imran Khan, became in a matter of hours, the second most searched name on Google after Donald Trump. On the other hand, India’s Modi languished in fifth place after his insipid speech which was primarily targeted for his voter base. Indeed, his was not a speech for the United Nations; it sounded like a well-rehearsed election campaign rant.
On the domestic front, Pakistani Twitter and Facebook users have been effusive in praise and criticism of Imran’s speech. This is to be expected. PMLN’s supporters have tried to find reasons to dish the speech but have been unable to provide a real argument for dislike other than to resort to vague and spiteful comments that have no real substance or proof. This is a weak response, a meaningless and limp reaction.
But overwhelmingly, there has been more acceptance and admiration than negativity. Met this lady today at a university. She was a visiting professor from a foreign university, and she said she had not come across a more valid and telling speech by a Pakistani leader in memory. And she was not an Imran Khan fan!
The response from across the border too was as expected. The first thing they zeroed in on was that Imran had dared to make a nuclear threat on the stage that is the United Nations General Assembly. That, of course, is not true. He never did. On the contrary he had pointed out the threats that could lead to such a terrifying eventuality, pinpointing that the situation in Kashmir, caused by India sending in 900,000 troops could trigger instability, leading to dire consequences. He called for restraint and asked the UN to intervene and let the Kashmiri people decide their destiny as mandated.
The Indian media twisted this to their liking. It’s like they have no mind of their own.
Imran Khan’s was not a threat, but a sane call for survival.
The Indian media also managed to sideline the dangerous and inhumane situation prevailing in Kashmir by barely mentioning it. They continued their mantra of radical Islamists and terrorists in Pakistan, something Imran had thrown out in the open with the challenge that it could be verified by UN observers and any other powers that may be.
It was almost like the Indian media is so indoctrinated in their hate of anything Pakistani that they are unwilling to hear the truth even when it is right out in front of them. It’s like they are listening to a different tune.
There is a hilarious video out there on YouTube and Facebook, where an Indian reporter is in the midst of an impassioned diatribe against Pakistan, when he is heckled by some passers-by. He gets so inflamed that he starts screaming like an unhinged person. Just shows the tolerance level of their media. The man lost it. Instead of going about his job professionally, he resorted to abuse and screaming.
There is also an interesting mime going about in which PM Modi is asking rhetorically, “Did Imran call me Hitler?”
No. He did not.
What he said was that India blames Pakistan for fomenting trouble and nurturing terrorists, but don’t like to be told that their prime minister is a member of a terrorist organization — the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) which fashioned itself on Hitler’s Nazis and Mussolini’s fascists. The RSS was responsible for the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and had in the years since, in the name of Hindu nationalism, proceeded to kill, torture and maim, thousands of Muslims, Hindus, and Christians in India.
This point was ignored by the Indian media as was Imran’s premise that the RSS and RAW were involved in subversion and terrorist activities in Pakistan’s Balochistan province.
What the Indian media deliberately ignored was Imran’s plea for peace. He said, “Let’s put all this behind and move forward through trade and cooperation. What’s done is done, right or wrong, and move on towards shared prosperity and trust.”
Nope.
They did not hear that.
All they heard was threats by Imran Khan and promises made earlier by Modi to provide Indians with more housing, better living conditions and the broader implementation of the Adhar card, a digitally monitored identification card system, something Pakistan started back in the early eighties.
It’s just a matter of perspective.
And yes, Mr. Modi, how about building some public toilets in India where people use fields, drains, empty spaces and the rail tracks to do their ‘business.’ That would go a long way in bettering environmental health since the environment is what you started your speech with.
But then 70-plus years of mistrust and abuse of sensibility does not go away overnight because of two speeches made at the United Nations General Assembly.
Just saying, it’s a matter of perspective.
Photo: AP
March 24, 2025: Explore the 10 critical reasons why Pakistan's legacy media continues to disappoint, from political bias and corporate influence to digital transition failures and unsustainable business models in Pakistani journalism.
September 07, 2024: Pakistani media is under fire for its lack of investigative reporting, political influence, and censorship. With talk shows becoming monotonous and biased, the public is turning to digital platforms for real news. Read on to learn how Pakistani journalism is failing its people.
July 11, 2024: Explore the challenges and opportunities expat journalists face in the UAE, with insights from Imran Naeem Ahmad, a former Gulf News journalist. Discover the impact of censorship, career prospects, and the reality of working for leading newspapers like Khaleej Times and Gulf News in Dubai.
July 09, 2024: Explore the profound impact of censorship on Pakistani journalism. Delve into the challenges faced by journalists, the erosion of press freedom, and broader societal implications in a country grappling with media restrictions and government control.
July 08, 2024: Discover the critical role of local news in a globalized world and how grassroots journalism empowers communities, ensures informed citizenship, and strengthens our societal fabric in the age of global connectivity.
July 06, 2024: Explore the challenges facing print media in Asia, from digital competition to financial struggles, and discover how newspapers and magazines are adapting to survive in the digital age.
July 03, 2024: Discover how independent media outlets in Asia are transforming journalism by breaking barriers and shaping public opinion. Learn about the challenges and triumphs of these new voices in the media landscape.
June 28, 2024: Dive into an extensive exploration of the ominous challenges besieging Pakistan's print media sector. Delve into the heart of the debate on whether traditional newspapers can withstand the onslaught of the digital revolution.
April 11, 2025 Sindhi journalist AD Shar was brutally murdered in Khairpur, Sindh. His body was found dumped on Handiyari Link Road. PFUJ has declared a three-day mourning period and demanded justice.
April 10, 2025 The Azad Jammu and Kashmir government has filed a case against The Daily Jammu & Kashmir and its staff for alleged fake news, drawing condemnation from PFUJ and IFJ, who demand immediate withdrawal of the FIR and an end to media repression in Pakistan.
April 08, 2025 Journalist Arzoo Kazmi alleges that Pakistan's state agencies, including the FIA, have blocked her CNIC, passport, and bank account while threatening her. She calls it a direct attack on journalism.
April 07, 2025 The Islamabad High Court has directed IG Islamabad to produce journalist Ahmad Noorani’s missing brothers, as the Ministry of Defence denies custody. SIM activity was traced in Bahawalpur, and investigations into their suspected abduction continue.
April 07, 2025 Journalist and Raftar founder Farhan Mallick has been granted bail by a Karachi court in a case concerning anti-state content aired on his YouTube channel. He still faces separate charges related to an alleged illegal call center and data theft.