JournalismPakistan.com | Published September 17, 2024 at 01:47 pm | A JP Special Report
Join our WhatsApp channel
ISLAMABAD—Since February, Pakistan’s digital landscape has faced unprecedented limitations with the continued ban on X (formerly Twitter). Initially sparked by a viral video of a Rawalpindi elections officer, Liaqat Ali Chattha, boasting about altering election results, the platform has remained inaccessible (without the VPN), raising questions about free speech, transparency, and the government's motives.
Pakistan enforced the ban citing concerns of national security and social unrest. While this might seem like an authoritarian measure aimed at curbing dissent, the reality is far more complex—and hypocritical.
On one hand, many Pakistanis continue to access X through VPNs, undeterred by the official ban. On the other hand, the government itself—ironically—remains very active on the platform. Senior politicians, including the prime minister and his ministers, use X to broadcast their views, making the ban seem like an exercise in selective censorship.
The Sindh High Court (SHC) is now handling the fallout of this controversial ban, and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has found itself in hot water. What was once a straightforward case of censorship is now mired in conflicting statements and legal uncertainty.
During a recent court hearing, the PTA's shifting stance on the ban angered SHC Chief Justice, who hinted at possible contempt of court proceedings against the PTA Chairman. This follows a PTA lawyer's earlier assurance to the court that the ban had been lifted, only for a government lawyer to contradict this claim, citing a "misunderstanding." The PTA's indecision has led to widespread frustration not only in court but also among Pakistan's online communities, who rely on platforms like X for real-time news, discussions, and free expression.
At the heart of the matter lies Article 19 of the Pakistani Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech, subject to reasonable restrictions. This ongoing ban, however, pushes the boundaries of what is considered "reasonable." While the PTA argues that the platform poses a threat due to certain viral content, others believe the ban is an overreach of government control. Social media platforms like X have long served as a space for dissent, debate, and diverse opinions, making their suspension a direct hit to the democratic fabric of the country.
The silence of the Deputy Attorney General during recent proceedings only added to the confusion, leaving many to question the transparency and accountability of those in power. Was the PTA's conflicting statement a simple mistake, or does it indicate deeper issues within the government's approach to digital media regulation?
While the government lawyer claims no formal instructions were issued to lift the ban, critics argue that the state's attempts to silence platforms like X reflect a broader trend of media suppression in Pakistan. In recent years, the country has seen increased crackdowns on independent journalism, and social media bans have become a tool for controlling narratives. The lingering ban on X is a stark reminder of how quickly access to information can be restricted, and how difficult it is to reverse such decisions once they are made.
It's worth noting that this isn't the only legal battle over the suspension of X. A petition filed in the Islamabad High Court highlights how the ban directly violates Article 19. The petitioner points out the fundamental right to free speech, arguing that platforms like X play an essential role in holding authorities accountable.
As the courts continue to grapple with the PTA's confusing stances and government lawyers provide conflicting testimonies, one thing is clear: the battle for free speech is far from over. With the next hearing adjourned to September 24, all eyes are on the SHC to deliver a verdict that could set a critical precedent for Pakistan's digital future.
The bigger picture
Banning social media platforms in the digital age is a dangerous precedent. While authorities argue the need to control harmful content, overzealous censorship risks silencing dissent and closing off a vital platform for public debate. The PTA's mismanagement of the X ban exposes not just the fragility of Pakistan’s media freedoms but also the underlying tension between state control and civil liberties.
Will the Sindh High Court's intervention finally bring clarity, or is this just the beginning of more confusion and state overreach? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the longer this ban drags on, the greater the implications for freedom of speech in Pakistan.
As the country waits for the next chapter in this legal drama, Pakistanis remain caught in a digital limbo. For a nation that thrives on dialogue, the ongoing ban on X is more than a restriction—it's a direct challenge to the values of transparency, accountability, and the free flow of information.
April 11, 2025: Sindhi journalist AD Shar was brutally murdered in Khairpur, Sindh. His body was found dumped on Handiyari Link Road. PFUJ has declared a three-day mourning period and demanded justice.
April 10, 2025: The Azad Jammu and Kashmir government has filed a case against The Daily Jammu & Kashmir and its staff for alleged fake news, drawing condemnation from PFUJ and IFJ, who demand immediate withdrawal of the FIR and an end to media repression in Pakistan.
April 08, 2025: Journalist Arzoo Kazmi alleges that Pakistan's state agencies, including the FIA, have blocked her CNIC, passport, and bank account while threatening her. She calls it a direct attack on journalism.
April 07, 2025: The Islamabad High Court has directed IG Islamabad to produce journalist Ahmad Noorani’s missing brothers, as the Ministry of Defence denies custody. SIM activity was traced in Bahawalpur, and investigations into their suspected abduction continue.
April 07, 2025: Journalist and Raftar founder Farhan Mallick has been granted bail by a Karachi court in a case concerning anti-state content aired on his YouTube channel. He still faces separate charges related to an alleged illegal call center and data theft.
April 03, 2025: Veteran journalist Ghulam Abbas Shah has joined Discover Pakistan Television as the Head of Programming. With 25 years of experience in leading news organizations, he looks forward to contributing to quality storytelling and content.
April 02, 2025: The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) has strongly condemned the visit of a group of Pakistani journalists to Israel, calling it a violation of journalistic ethics and a betrayal of press freedom and human rights. PFUJ demands a transparent investigation into the matter.
March 30, 2025: Dawn criticizes Pakistan’s plan to use TV dramas against extremism, highlighting financial and digital challenges. Can media alone solve deep-rooted issues?
April 03, 2025 The International Press Institute (IPI) and International Media Support (IMS) invite nominations for the 2025 World Press Freedom Hero and Free Media Pioneer Awards. Recognizing courageous journalists and innovative media, the awards will be presented at IPI’s 75th-anniversary World Congress in Vienna. Submit your nominations by April 30, 2025.
April 01, 2025 Photojournalist Suresh Rajak was burned alive while covering a violent protest in Kathmandu. The IFJ and its affiliates condemn the attack and call for an urgent investigation to hold the perpetrators accountable.
April 01, 2025 Assam Police arrested digital journalist Dilwar Hussain Mozumder for covering a protest against alleged corruption at Assam Co-Operative Bank. Media organizations have condemned the arrest, calling it an attack on press freedom.
March 29, 2025 A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to dismantle Voice of America (VOA), ruling that the move likely violated legal procedures. The decision protects over 1,200 journalists and media staff.
March 28, 2025 Turkey deports BBC journalist Mark Lowen over 'public order' threat and fines opposition TV channels covering Istanbul Mayor's arrest. Critics condemn crackdown on press freedom amid rising political tensions.